Vehicles with missile warning that shouldn't
Needs Review, Needs TriagePublic

Description

The indicated vehicles have some sort of missile warning system despite them having no such capability irl. This can be remedied by setting each one of these vehicle's "incomingMissileDetectionSystem" value to equal 0 instead of 16.

CUP_AAV_Base
CUP_BMP1_base
CUP_BMP2_base
CUP_BMP3_Base
CUP_BRDM2_Base
CUP_BTR40_Base
CUP_BTR40_MG_Base
CUP_BTR60_Base
CUP_BTR90_Base
CUP_Challenger2_base
CUP_FV432_Bulldog_Base
CUP_FV510_Base
CUP_GAZ_Vodnik_Base
CUP_LAV25_Base
CUP_Leopard2_Base
CUP_M113_Base
CUP_M163_Base
CUP_M1A2_TUSK_base
CUP_M1_Abrams_base
CUP_M2Bradley_Base
CUP_M60A3_Base
CUP_MCV80_Base
CUP_MTLB_Base
CUP_StrykerBase
CUP_T34_Base
CUP_T55_Base
CUP_T72_Base
CUP_ZSU23_Afghan_Base
CUP_ZSU23_Base

Details

Affected classnames
CUP_StrykerBase, CUP_M2Bradley_Base, CUP_MCV80_Base, CUP_FV510_Base, CUP_FV432_Bulldog_Base, CUP_M60A3_Base, CUP_Leopard2_Base, CUP_M1_Abrams_base, CUP_Challenger2_base, CUP_M1A2_TUSK_base, CUP_LAV25_Base, CUP_AAV_Base, CUP_BTR90_Base, CUP_BTR60_Base, CUP_M163_Base, CUP_M113_Base, CUP_T34_Base, CUP_T55_Base, CUP_BTR40_MG_Base, CUP_BTR40_Base, CUP_GAZ_Vodnik_Base, CUP_BRDM2_Base, CUP_T72_Base, CUP_BMP1_base, CUP_BMP2_base, CUP_BMP3_Base, CUP_MTLB_Base, CUP_ZSU23_Base, CUP_ZSU23_Afghan_Base
Branch
Release/Stable
Reproducable without other mods?
Yes

Related Objects

Goopy created this task.Apr 3 2019, 7:39 AM
Apollo added a subscriber: Apollo.Apr 3 2019, 7:57 AM

I know the lavs have a laser warning system. so if its a getting lased by a enemy veh or if you fired a missile at it that relied on a laser it would pick that up and you can have it turn its turret to the threat.

Goopy added a comment.Apr 3 2019, 8:00 AM

The LAVs depicted in CUP are the A1 variant, which do not have that system.

Goopy changed Affected classnames from CUP_StrykerBase, CUP_M2Bradley_Base, CUP_MCV80_Base, CUP_FV510_Base, CUP_FV432_Bulldog_Base, CUP_M60A3_Base, CUP_Leopard2_Base, CUP_M1_Abrams_base, CUP_Challenger2_base, CUP_M1A2_TUSK_base, CUP_LAV25_Base, CUP_AAV_Base, CUP_BTR90_Base, CUP_BTR60_Base, CUP_M163_Base, CUP_M113_Base, CUP_T34_Base, CUP_T55_Base, CUP_BTR40_MG_Base, CUP_BTR40_Base, CUP_GAZ_Vodnik_Base, CUP_BRDM2_Base, CUP_T72_Base, CUP_BMP1_base, CUP_BMP2_base, CUP_MTLB_Base, CUP_ZSU23_Base, CUP_ZSU23_Afghan_Base to CUP_StrykerBase, CUP_M2Bradley_Base, CUP_MCV80_Base, CUP_FV510_Base, CUP_FV432_Bulldog_Base, CUP_M60A3_Base, CUP_Leopard2_Base, CUP_M1_Abrams_base, CUP_Challenger2_base, CUP_M1A2_TUSK_base, CUP_LAV25_Base, CUP_AAV_Base, CUP_BTR90_Base, CUP_BTR60_Base, CUP_M163_Base, CUP_M113_Base, CUP_T34_Base, CUP_T55_Base, CUP_BTR40_MG_Base, CUP_BTR40_Base, CUP_GAZ_Vodnik_Base, CUP_BRDM2_Base, CUP_T72_Base, CUP_BMP1_base, CUP_BMP2_base, CUP_BMP3_Base, CUP_MTLB_Base, CUP_ZSU23_Base, CUP_ZSU23_Afghan_Base.Apr 3 2019, 8:05 AM
Goopy updated the task description. (Show Details)Apr 3 2019, 5:27 PM
Goopy updated the task description. (Show Details)Sun, Nov 24, 9:29 PM
Goopy checked Reproducable without other mods?.
Eogos added a subscriber: Eogos.Sun, Nov 24, 10:26 PM

Would have been much nicer if you'd made an actual list rather than just the classnames tbh

Goopy added a comment.EditedSun, Nov 24, 10:38 PM

Are the classnames not the most precise and easy way to list out the affected vehicles? With them all one needs to do is simply copy and paste them into the config viewer and they're given the exact item with the issue and they can start working from there, no need to waste time figuring out which exact item has the issue.

Except for the fact that just throwing them in there in a mass jumble of classnames is a lot harder to read than doing

  • Vehicle Name (Classname)
  • Vehicle Name (Classname)
  • Vehicle Name (Classname)

etc.

Goopy added a comment.EditedSun, Nov 24, 11:29 PM

This seems to be a personal opinion on how you'd prefer to format a more aesthetically pleasing ticket, as it is now the classnames are able to be discerned from one another and it honestly doesn't make much of a real difference to go out of ones way to format it like that again if it's already been done one way. If you have any further comments about this specific topic please take it to the discord in the #public channel to prevent the #activity channel from being spammed with irrelevant conversation rather than new tickets.

Drofseh updated the task description. (Show Details)Mon, Nov 25, 1:15 AM

Fixed it for you.

And I'm pretty sure we already talked about formatting like this in T2989.

Goopy added a subscriber: Tookatee.EditedMon, Nov 25, 4:58 AM

Thank you for reformatting it, I guess? Also, nobody has spoken to me about anything of the sort. That ticket you pointed to was authored by an @Tookatee where it looks like it was actually really needed as that ticket has nearly triple the classnames of this one.