also noticed if you change the Weather - Waves params , it changes the reflection behavior a lot.

Has major gameplay impact

Pls continue on discord, this is starting to get tangential and flood the activity channel with this.

In T3525#51348, @Goopy wrote:

Weapon sound is largely determined by fire rate and weapon caliber...

If that's how you guys want it to be that's fine I won't discuss it any further, I was just pointing out the inconsistency in its audio and then issuing the correction to the ticket when it was closed as invalid for having the SPAR audio files (despite that also not being a 7.62x39mm weapon and it having the same sound as the CAR-95.) Nothing harsh meant by it.

Determined to be not am issue. Please accept that.

Weapon sound is largely determined by fire rate and weapon caliber, and since this weapon has a similar fire rate to the other CUP/Vanilla 7.62x39mm weapons it makes sense that it should use the audio files that those weapons use. Having have the audio of a SPAR just sounds off when you know it's the same caliber as an AK (and yet it sounds completely different than either CUP's or the Vanilla AKM.

Just because they are the same calibre doesn't mean that they would sound the same.

That's still wrong lmao, the SPAR-17 is a 7.62x59 weapon. Also I didn't realize this until I checked now, but both the SPAR 17 and the CAR-95 use the same audio files, so that's why I listed it as such in the ticket. Regardless the audio file should be changed to that of a 7.62x39mm weapon's, such as the vanilla AKM's or one of the CUP 7.62x39mm AKs.

soundSetShot[] = {"SPAR_17_Shot_SoundSet", "SPAR_17_Tail_SoundSet", "SPAR_17_interiorTail_SoundSet"};

Was gonna make a new ticket for this but since it's fairly related I'll just tack it on here. The M240 also blinds the user when fully depressed due to the stock clipping into the player's camera. Video example here

Looks more like the road itself is out of place, looking at the satmap below it.

No change with russian missiles in 1.13.0. AI won't use Ataka,Vikhr,Falanga. AI Su-34 also doesn't use any guided missiles like the BI KH-29.
The usability of Shturm that worked before is also reduced to zero due to my testing. I tested the missiles with no other loadout and no cannon ammo.

This was intentional on my part, as I felt one single unit didn't warrant an entirely new faction, as such, it was put with the ANZAC FFG under RNZN. Similarly, the USN Poseidon lives in the USMC faction.

add KSKV to the list >

Don't know if it helps, but I remember that if the pieces rotated around (not pitch & yaw) from their original "pre-cut" orientation , the reflection go wild and act strange , moving in in the wrong direction when player moves. Maybe it has to do something with yaw & pitch , micro shift from the original position...

I guess you just found the issue cause you just pushed this, https://dev.cup-arma3.org/rWEAPONSSVN1269 .

Despite that value it will not let you lock anything over 2000 meters away. Additionally, the description wasn't updated to reflect this (it still lists it's maximum distance as 2500). I recommend you do some testing on your end to confirm this.

missileLockMaxDistance = 4750;

Yup, known before i commit the changes. Not really sure why yet, doesn't happen at all distances and/or lighting situations.

We are working on this issue. Please allow some time.

I got error Warning Message: Addon 'CUP_AirVehicles_Core' requires addon 'CUP_Weapons_VehicleWeapons'

That's why I asked, to make sure the issue is resolved

@Alwarren Since this ticket was posted the Javelin's damage properties were fixed by @Urban (https://dev.cup-arma3.org/rWEAPONSSVN1060), so I don't think the Javelin's low damage is an issue anymore.

Awesome, good thing it was an easy fix. I'm just wondering for how long CUP's been configured like this. Did vanilla always use the higher value? I've always wondered why there seemed to be a higher percentage of one hit kills/deaths in CUP, but since I use CUP so frequently I almost forgot how the vanilla game's damage felt.

This is the flight path from the ACE top down, referred to in the configs as "JAV_TOP" it seems to come in at an angle which means it doesn't kill on the first hit. It took 2 shots each time I tested it in top down mode. Direct fire killed it instantly each time.

@Cyruz Is it a general ACE issue, or with our ACE Compatibility ?

armor was indeed wrong, and armorStructural too. Wearing CUP uniforms made you squishy

Might be related to the HitPoint's armor value.

I think it's only with ACE loaded and that does stuff to the missile guidance

Tried it just now with a T-90 and a T-72:

DPM / OD added.
Flecktarn and tropentarn variants are availble as Germany uniform
Flecktarn/OD is available as NAPA uniform

Vanilla one (BTR-K Kamysh) works fine with exactly the same waypoints and squad (had to delete two guys who were over-capacity though).

what happens with other vehicles? like the bmp from vanilla

The BMP-1 doesn't seem great at following waypoints in general (for instance, in the attached mission the "Crewed BMP-1 + Separate squad" one will tend to overshoot its "Transport unload" waypoint by a hundred meters or so) so maybe it's somehow a PhysX issue? 🤔

Apparently, the issue was that there were two vertices at the rear at the same space, resulting in a null-sized triangle. I merged the vertices and simplified the fire geometry a bit (it struck me as overly complex) and now the hits work.

Hmmm, I wonder how BIS was able to get their aircraft to go supersonic then. Because even a straight copy of the Blackwasp/Shikra's performance characteristics would be better than how it is now.

top speed has nothing to do with the envelope array, and afaik the su34 is still capped like the f35

Has an adjustment to the envelope values like I mentioned been tried before? Cause if it was an engine issue, wouldn't stuff like the Blackwasp or SU-34 not be able to reach higher top speeds that they're able to hit now?

engine issue, fix is too time intensive and causes other issues

Actually it's not even possible for the F-35 to equip the AIM-9L IRL. The hardware and software (or lack thereof in the AIM-9L's case) is completely incompatible with the F-35's weapons computer and weapons bays, those were optimized for the AIM-9X with it's smaller form factor, off-boresight capabilities, and upgradable software to counter developments in ECCM. So the CUP F-35 really should have these AIM-9Ls be swapped out entirely for the vanilla AIM-9X, as it wouldn't even make sense for it to have them equipped even if a pristine AIM-9L model was developed.