Gras Clutter in Petrolstation by Vybor.
GRID: 036089

fixed as needed to bring them to realistic levels

On a possibly related note, letting go of W will leave the tank cruising decelerating extremely slowly once around 20 km/h. In addition to this, the tracks appear to be shifting weirdly back and forth.

Realistic standards, or vanilla standards?

You should move all lods up as it shown in arma2 samples panelak.p3d

Thank you for reformatting it, I guess? Also, nobody has spoken to me about anything of the sort. That ticket you pointed to was authored by an @Tookatee where it looks liked it was actually really needed as that ticket has nearly triple the classnames of this one.

Fixed it for you.

This seems to be a personal opinion on how you'd prefer to format a more aesthetically pleasing ticket, as it is now the classnames are able to be discerned from one another and it honestly doesn't make much of a real difference to go out of ones way to format it like that again if it's already been done one way. If you have any further comments about this specific topic please take it to the discord in the #general channel to prevent the #activity channel from being spammed with irrelevant conversation rather than new tickets.

Except for the fact that just throwing them in there in a mass jumble of classnames is a lot harder to read than doing

Are the classnames not the most precise and easy way to list out the affected vehicles? With them all one needs to do is simply copy and paste them into the config viewer and they're given the exact item with the issue and they can start working from there, no need to figure out which exact item has the issue.

Would have been much nicer if you'd made an actual list rather than just the classnames tbh

IIRC the Range stat in the Virtual Arsenal is based on the maximumRange config value for its fire modes.

I support showing the player the semi auto mode; as ARMA does not support progressive triggers having the extra mode will allows the player to choose the method of fire then intend to use.

Weapons done in rWEAPONSSVN1282 but I forgot to tag it

Completed up to this point with revision 6 commit.

Vybor factory :
[4181.58,8968.48,0]

https://discord.gg/N5aQhkA

Hello could you send the invite again?

Try asking in the discord first, as this doesn't seem like an issue on our part: https://discord.gg/0WqE6NaD5yKT281F

hole in view/fire, not in geo
That house has other missing holes, but I think they are too small, or inconvenient for grenades

Same, no view/fire/geo but big enough for grenades
house_l_6_ep1

These holes aren't even in view/fire geo. But they look large enough to lop a grenade through

Also, this is more of a support thing. not a bug report. You're better off asking questions like this on our Discord server.

Whenever your unit owner has fixed his server or you fixed your steam workshop download of CUP.

The unit owner wants to know when signature issue will be fixed

Ok

Still not our problem then, it might be the new signature checks. We have other people where the signatures work

Both me and the server have the up to date version of cup and it still pops up that

https://dev.cup-arma3.org/rWEAPONSSVN1278

Tried running in vanilla and with CUP + CBA loaded from the workshop, and to me the camera appears to function the same.

When Cup units and Weapons (With CBA) are loaded the camera.sqs and BIS_fnc_cameraOld no longer function correctly. The camera stays on the player and does not act correctly. I found this bug through trail and error and it's only presents when these mods are loaded together.

whoops, that's embarrassing.

Fort using 5,45 ammo

needs new art, unless you can make it it wont be fixed.

Appears it was a corrupted dev update on my end causing this and the vest issue you can close.

Same as at https://dev.cup-arma3.org/T3540

Both woodland and desert ACR piltos look ok both dev and release.

1. The Vodnik, as it is in now, was in Arma 2 in two variants (BPPU and 2xPK). We added the GMG version because it was easy to do
2. Adapting the turret of the BTR-80 to fit on the Vodnik would require retexturing, which takes time
3. Time is better spent on other vehicles that are in wide use.

In T3188#51578, @Alwarren wrote:

Very unlikely, since the Vodnik was never formally adopted by any army to the best of my knowledge, and adapting the BTR-80 turret to the Vodnik's texture would be too much work for a doubtful outcome.

Very unlikely, since the Vodnik was never formally adopted by any army to the best of my knowledge, and adapting the BTR-80 turret to the Vodnik's texture would be too much work for a doubtful outcome.

it has BTR 80 turret not BRDM-2.would be really nice to get it