IIRC the Range stat in the Virtual Arsenal is based on the maximumRange config value for its fire modes.

I support showing the player the semi auto mode; as ARMA does not support progressive triggers having the extra mode will allows the player to choose the method of fire then intend to use.

Weapons done in rWEAPONSSVN1282 but I forgot to tag it

Completed up to this point with revision 6 commit.

Vybor factory :
[4181.58,8968.48,0]

https://discord.gg/N5aQhkA

Hello could you send the invite again?

Try asking in the discord first, as this doesn't seem like an issue on our part: https://discord.gg/0WqE6NaD5yKT281F

hole in view/fire, not in geo
That house has other missing holes, but I think they are too small, or inconvenient for grenades

Same, no view/fire/geo but big enough for grenades
house_l_6_ep1

These holes aren't even in view/fire geo. But they look large enough to lop a grenade through

Also, this is more of a support thing. not a bug report. You're better off asking questions like this on our Discord server.

Whenever your unit owner has fixed his server or you fixed your steam workshop download of CUP.

The unit owner wants to know when signature issue will be fixed

Ok

Still not our problem then, it might be the new signature checks. We have other people where the signatures work

Both me and the server have the up to date version of cup and it still pops up that

https://dev.cup-arma3.org/rWEAPONSSVN1278

Tried running in vanilla and with CUP + CBA loaded from the workshop, and to me the camera appears to function the same.

When Cup units and Weapons (With CBA) are loaded the camera.sqs and BIS_fnc_cameraOld no longer function correctly. The camera stays on the player and does not act correctly. I found this bug through trail and error and it's only presents when these mods are loaded together.

whoops, that's embarrassing.

Fort using 5,45 ammo

needs new art, unless you can make it it wont be fixed.

Appears it was a corrupted dev update on my end causing this and the vest issue you can close.

Same as at https://dev.cup-arma3.org/T3540

Both woodland and desert ACR piltos look ok both dev and release.

1. The Vodnik, as it is in now, was in Arma 2 in two variants (BPPU and 2xPK). We added the GMG version because it was easy to do
2. Adapting the turret of the BTR-80 to fit on the Vodnik would require retexturing, which takes time
3. Time is better spent on other vehicles that are in wide use.

In T3188#51578, @Alwarren wrote:

Very unlikely, since the Vodnik was never formally adopted by any army to the best of my knowledge, and adapting the BTR-80 turret to the Vodnik's texture would be too much work for a doubtful outcome.

Very unlikely, since the Vodnik was never formally adopted by any army to the best of my knowledge, and adapting the BTR-80 turret to the Vodnik's texture would be too much work for a doubtful outcome.

it has BTR 80 turret not BRDM-2.would be really nice to get it

I tested all vodniks armor and glasses.all vodniks protected as it stated in real life 7.62x54mm.only vodnik BPPU front driver and passenger armor doesnt exist at all.all bullets go through
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqnTIrZICSg&feature=youtu.be
please fix it

https://dev.cup-arma3.org/rTERRAINSCORESVN538

https://dev.cup-arma3.org/rUNITSSVN637

All of CUP maps should now be configured, I will not be editing CWA though if someone wants to do that then feel free.

After the latest update this issue has reappeared, the T-90 once again has a top speed of 22 km/h, regardless of whether or not you press shift or the terrain. It should have a top speed of 60 km/h.

Occurs at any distance when the gunner is under AI control, doesn't occur at all under manual control.

In addition to issue 2, foot falls still sound they're on a rain soaked surface rather than snow covered, so walking everywhere sounds like a muddy field.

https://dev.cup-arma3.org/rTERRAINSMAPSSVN12