Also, this is more of a support thing. not a bug report. You're better off asking questions like this on our Discord server.

Still not our problem then, it might be the new signature checks. We have other people where the signatures work

1. The Vodnik, as it is in now, was in Arma 2 in two variants (BPPU and 2xPK). We added the GMG version because it was easy to do
2. Adapting the turret of the BTR-80 to fit on the Vodnik would require retexturing, which takes time
3. Time is better spent on other vehicles that are in wide use.

Very unlikely, since the Vodnik was never formally adopted by any army to the best of my knowledge, and adapting the BTR-80 turret to the Vodnik's texture would be too much work for a doubtful outcome.

Determined to be not am issue. Please accept that.

We are working on this issue. Please allow some time.

That's why I asked, to make sure the issue is resolved

Tried it just now with a T-90 and a T-72:

Apparently, the issue was that there were two vertices at the rear at the same space, resulting in a null-sized triangle. I merged the vertices and simplified the fire geometry a bit (it struck me as overly complex) and now the hits work.

The AGM-65D is an infrared/imaging missile and cannot be laser guided. Some Maverick types can, but not the D

For next update. A number of planes are still missing proper hitpoints.

maxFordingDepth is not enough, looks like it needs a buoyancy LOD as well

ERROR: Texan not found.

Definitely all the German units. I don't know how many of our other units have a head proxy in the Shadow LOD. The new German uniforms have them, if this is true then there is nothing we can do. BIS needs to fix this.

Hm, switching the shadow volume inside out didn't work... I am starting to wonder if this is an actual shadow volume issue.

Wasn't there a recent change that removed the head from the shadow LOD and added it to the head?
At least I seem to think that was intended to happen, but if it didn't it might be that the Tanoa heads have a faulty shadow volume

I looked into this and to be honest, I don't believe it can be done in a generic way. If I tighten the facewear, it will start clipping through the head, and if I loosen the straps on the helmet they look like they stand out too much, there is too much of a gap in it.

Since the attachment system of Arma 3 is severely limited, I don't think there is anything to be done. Combo's like this will always work on some and not work on others.

Really need something more than "it looks to be still intact" I'm afraid. None of the material lists anything, they usually claim that the crew compartment is used for storage of Stinger missiles.

Any reference on that? All I could find indicates that the M6 has a crew of four, driver, gunner and a Stinger team, and no carry capacity.

I have observed the same issue with other addons, not only CUP Terrains. For example, Varanon's FHQ Debug Console has the same issue. I personally think it is not a problem of the addons but rather of the Eden comment node.

`Latest version of what? `

`I am having the same problem as Danio20003. I am on Windows 10, using the latest version of CBA and CUP (and nothing else).`

`Side note, it also appears the US Army faction has two "Cars (Woodland)" sections. Probably want to merge those into one section.`

ChernarusRedux is not a CUP terrain

The graphics look like they are supposed to look.

Huh? At long distance lower LOD's are used. I don't see your point. This looks exactly how it is supposed to look

Looks perfectly fine here. The problem is on your side. It looks like LODs are not correctly loaded, which usually means your memory is low. Check that your system drive has enough swap space.

`Is this server or mod issue?`

To the best of my knowledge Mk17 a.k.a SCAR-H uses its own proprietary magazine that isn't interchangeable.

I am not even sure that it can be done automatically.

Doesn't look like a CUP map to me.

Likely cause: During polygon reduction for lower LODS the proxy triangle got murdered. Easiest way to fix is to take a higher lod and merge back.

Every such change potentially breaks a mission. In the case of the 7.62 flash hider, the damage is probably going to be pretty low since most people wouldn't do this combination as a default, but it is possible and if so has the potential to kill a mission. The question is really how likely it is to have been used.

Every mission that has a custom loadout for anyone carrying a PP-19 would break with this. The only workable solution would be to have a 9mm surpressor IN ADDITION to the one already available. Otherwise, missions *will* break.

There are a couple of other units that don't have NVG's equipped by default, namely PMC, German KSK, Force Recon and a few others. As a rule of thumb with the units I configured, I usually have NVG's on the vest if the unit doesn't have a helmet; for example, NVG's on a Shemag look weird.

If you come across such a model that is freely usable, feel free to send it our way.

Still an issue. Needs to be addressed with Stryker Overhaul

Can we just say, pull BMP-1 physx on the MT-LB and call it a day?

Real life Challengers and Warriors have tea cookers, for example.

Strykers are in urgent need of a general overhaul. Planned for the next update.

Resolved for the most parts. The problem is that some of the plates are very close together and can sometimes be ignored.

For whatever reason, LOD 2.0 of the vest was a skeleton.