Was gonna make a new ticket for this but since it's fairly related I'll just tack it on here. The M240 also blinds the user when fully depressed due to the stock clipping into the player's camera. Video example here

This was intentional on my part, as I felt one single unit didn't warrant an entirely new faction, as such, it was put with the ANZAC FFG under RNZN. Similarly, the USN Poseidon lives in the USMC faction.

Vanilla one (BTR-K Kamysh) works fine with exactly the same waypoints and squad (had to delete two guys who were over-capacity though).

what happens with other vehicles? like the bmp from vanilla

The BMP-1 doesn't seem great at following waypoints in general (for instance, in the attached mission the "Crewed BMP-1 + Separate squad" one will tend to overshoot its "Transport unload" waypoint by a hundred meters or so) so maybe it's somehow a PhysX issue? 🤔

Apparently, the issue was that there were two vertices at the rear at the same space, resulting in a null-sized triangle. I merged the vertices and simplified the fire geometry a bit (it struck me as overly complex) and now the hits work.

Hmmm, I wonder how BIS was able to get their aircraft to go supersonic then. Because even a straight copy of the Blackwasp/Shikra's performance characteristics would be better than how it is now.

top speed has nothing to do with the envelope array, and afaik the su34 is still capped like the f35

Has an adjustment to the envelope values like I mentioned been tried before? Cause if it was an engine issue, wouldn't stuff like the Blackwasp or SU-34 not be able to reach higher top speeds that they're able to hit now?

engine issue, fix is too time intensive and causes other issues

Actually it's not even possible for the F-35 to equip the AIM-9L IRL. The hardware and software (or lack thereof in the AIM-9L's case) is completely incompatible with the F-35's weapons computer and weapons bays, those were optimized for the AIM-9X with it's smaller form factor, off-boresight capabilities, and upgradable software to counter developments in ECCM. So the CUP F-35 really should have these AIM-9Ls be swapped out entirely for the vanilla AIM-9X, as it wouldn't even make sense for it to have them equipped even if a pristine AIM-9L model was developed.

In your screen shot it appears that the horizon isn't level to me.
https://i.gyazo.com/c0232989f642df239ca88232ceb61829.png

Fixed in rWEAPONSSVN1207

Mk19 is supposed to eject downward, so I would also just keep the same shells and then change the ejection direction to make it less obvious

I think it would be better to leave it as is until something new gets developed as the actual Mk.19 does eject shell casings and it looks better to have something actually eject out of the weapon rather than nothing (as you'd only really notice this inconsistency if you were looking at the shells ejecting rather than whatever you were firing at.)

In that case, better to just remove the ejecting shell altogether for the Mk19.

that means we'd have to create a new particle effect for the gmg if vanilla has none

Vanilla doesn't have a Mk19 equivalent but the closest thing, the 20mm GMG uses nothing.

what does vanilla use for GMG particles?

Please, add expected result (better with images)

Smoke grenade control panel, located on the gunners side of the turret, can also been seen here

getAllHitPointsDamage returns empty array so i decided to debinarize the model to proove it

i debinarized the model to be sure